The Null Device Blog

Random musings, rumblings, and what-have-you from an indie electronic band.

Whither the Full-Length?

In an era where a music consumer can pick and choose tracks from a digital distro site, and in an era where the breakneck pace of the internet makes keeping buzz going practically a full-time job, I wonder…is there a point to a traditional “album-length” album?

The argument for a full-length album is usually artistic – you can tell a longer, more detailed musical story and establish a more concrete musical identity with a full-length than you can with a shorter album.  But, given the huge upswing in single-track digital sales (and the subsequent decline in full-album sales) it could be argued that it’s almost moot – if fewer people hear the full-length album in favor of a select few tracks, then the message of the full-length is lost.  Additionally, with streaming services like Pandora leaping in popularity,  single-tracks are all a listener is going to hear.

Conversely though, if a listener likes a single track, a band should have additional content for them to purchase – whether it’s an iTunes “complete my album” or just additional downloads, selling single tracks alone isn’t a solution.

There’s the issue of keeping up buzz, too.   Certainly for me it takes a while to put together a full-length album.  Sublimation took a year, AMDM a year and half, Excursions took two, this one is taking even longer.  It’s hard to generate enough content to keep the name “fresh” so to speak if it takes 2 years to put out an album.  Given how quickly the musical landscape can change in two years, and how quickly word-of-mouth rises and falls on the faceblogotweetsphere,  taking that long can mean the differencde between a response of “oh great, a new album!” and “Who?  Oh, they’re still around?”  If you’re Depeche Mode or Morrissey or Radiohead you can fill the gap with innumerable repackagings, limited editions, best-ofs, etc, or sping the hiatus as “preapring a comeback.”  If you’re a guy with a partially converted basement studio and a day job, these aren’t available options, so putting out shorter releases more frequently seems like a good solution.

Of course, that brings us back to the question of artistry.  Nobody wants to sacrifice their message for some marketing.   Plus, there’s still the appearance of professionalism that releasing a full-length gets you, that no number of EPs, singles, and short-players will ever get you.

In short, I don’t know what the solution is.  But I’m thinking about this probably a lot more that I should.

Share this post
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
Comments
  • K_Dru
    I cant speak for the world, but shorter albums are all right too. As long as I don't have to download them. I will lose my aversion to such things when MP3s stop sounding like they were recorded through felt in a tin can. Which begs the question, you did mention a few CD copies of Recursions being made available, yes?

    I do kind of understand the questions at hand, here. I paint, and make my own media. The work I do takes months, but every teenager on deviantart churns this stuff out two or three pieces a day. The people who get hired are those with a firm grasp of overnight photoshopping. The answer I have come up with for myself is that one has to put out random sketches (remixes? Live tracks?) now and then, but fine compositions should not be abandoned altogether. There are people out there who still appreciate the extra effort. Of course, those people might be as happy with a small frame as a mural- since what you're discussing is not an issue of quality but of quantity.
  • K_Dru
    ::::tap, tap::: This thing on? OK. HI, I've been an insomniac lately and just found your blog as a result. I was a tiny bit alarmed by this post, because I hate MP3s (I can hear the difference and marvel that not everyone can) and I listen to albums more than any other format although I do enjoy Pandora. My friends and I all use Pandora as a way to find new albums to buy. So yeah, we're still out there. If I like a song, I'll buy the album. I know these things take time and am willing to wait. Just thought I should chime in for those of us whose taste is not dictated by whatever's being twitted about right now.
  • Hi, and thanks for joining in!

    Don't be too alarmed - I'm not talking about the death of the CD, specifically, I'm just talking about the death of the long-form recording. I can certainly hear the difference in an mp3 and, given my druthers, would buy something on CD. The stats, however, show that the market is going increasingly download-able.

    But that's only a sidebar, really. Since the music promotion arena is now so heavily saturated with thousands upon thousands of indie artists blogging, twittering, releasing, promoting, etc, can an artist afford to spend 2 years "off the grid" crafting a 12-track album when they could release a 6-track mini-album instead every year?

    Certainly for me, it's already been 2 years since I released "Excursions" and a 4th album is nowhere near ready, so I don't have anything "new" to promote - it's why I'm putting out a remix/b-Side collection next month. I'd prefer to put out all-new music but I just don't have a full-length ready yet. But would it be that bad for me to put out an album with 7 tracks of new material instead of 10-12, since I could probably do that by the end of the year?

    There's probably an inflation issue, too. I remember getting LP's back in the 70's and 80's that were only 8 songs. An "EP" was 4. Now it seems an EP is 8, a full length is 10-15 songs...
blog comments powered by Disqus